Validity: Difference between revisions
CSV import |
CSV import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Validity''' | {{Philosophy of science}} | ||
'''Validity''' refers to the extent to which a concept, conclusion, or measurement is well-founded and likely corresponds accurately to the real world based on [[probability]], [[evidence]], or [[logical reasoning]]. The term is used in many different contexts, including [[logic]], [[mathematics]], [[statistics]], [[psychology]], [[scientific methodology]], and [[law]], each of which has its own specific criteria and applications of the concept. | |||
==Types of Validity== | ==Types of Validity== | ||
In the realm of [[research]], validity is categorized into several types: | |||
===Content Validity=== | |||
Content validity refers to the extent to which a measure represents all facets of a given [[social construct]]. An example is a [[psychological test]] that accurately measures human intelligence or a survey that covers all areas of the subject it intends to measure. | |||
* ''' | ===Criterion Validity=== | ||
Criterion validity assesses how a measure correlates with an outcome criterion. It is further divided into: | |||
* '''Predictive Validity''': The extent to which a score on a scale or test predicts scores on some criterion measure. | |||
* '''Concurrent Validity''': The degree to which a test correlates with a previously validated measure taken at the same time. | |||
===Construct Validity=== | |||
Construct validity is used to ensure that the measure actually measures the construct it is intended to measure and not other variables. It is often assessed by testing the relationships between the test and other measures as specified in a theory. | |||
== | ===Face Validity=== | ||
Face validity refers to the extent to which a test appears effective in terms of its stated aims to a casual observer. This type of validity is often considered the weakest form of validity. | |||
* ''' | ===Internal and External Validity=== | ||
* '''Internal Validity''': The extent to which a causal conclusion based on a study is warranted, which is determined by the degree to which a study minimizes systematic error (or "bias"). | |||
* '''External Validity''': The extent to which the results of a study can be generalized to other situations and to other people. | |||
==Validity in Logic== | |||
In [[logic]], validity refers to a property of arguments whereby an argument is valid if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion nevertheless to be false. It is strictly a function of the argument's logical form—not the actual truth of the premises. | |||
==Validity in Law== | |||
In [[legal contexts]], validity denotes the legal soundness or force of an argument or statute. For example, a law can be said to have legal validity if it has been enacted in accordance with procedures laid down by the governing body. | |||
==Challenges in Establishing Validity== | |||
Establishing validity can be challenging, particularly in fields like [[psychology]] where measuring abstract concepts is inherently difficult. Researchers must use a variety of methods and criteria to assess the different aspects of validity, and no single test can fully establish it across all contexts. | |||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
* [[Reliability (statistics)]] | * [[Reliability (statistics)]] | ||
* [[Measurement | * [[Measurement]] | ||
* [[ | * [[Scientific method]] | ||
* [[Verification and validation]] | |||
[[Category:Philosophy of science]] | |||
[[Category:Statistics]] | |||
[[Category:Psychometrics]] | [[Category:Psychometrics]] | ||
{{stub}} | {{Philosophy-stub}} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:13, 13 August 2024
Validity refers to the extent to which a concept, conclusion, or measurement is well-founded and likely corresponds accurately to the real world based on probability, evidence, or logical reasoning. The term is used in many different contexts, including logic, mathematics, statistics, psychology, scientific methodology, and law, each of which has its own specific criteria and applications of the concept.
Types of Validity[edit]
In the realm of research, validity is categorized into several types:
Content Validity[edit]
Content validity refers to the extent to which a measure represents all facets of a given social construct. An example is a psychological test that accurately measures human intelligence or a survey that covers all areas of the subject it intends to measure.
Criterion Validity[edit]
Criterion validity assesses how a measure correlates with an outcome criterion. It is further divided into:
- Predictive Validity: The extent to which a score on a scale or test predicts scores on some criterion measure.
- Concurrent Validity: The degree to which a test correlates with a previously validated measure taken at the same time.
Construct Validity[edit]
Construct validity is used to ensure that the measure actually measures the construct it is intended to measure and not other variables. It is often assessed by testing the relationships between the test and other measures as specified in a theory.
Face Validity[edit]
Face validity refers to the extent to which a test appears effective in terms of its stated aims to a casual observer. This type of validity is often considered the weakest form of validity.
Internal and External Validity[edit]
- Internal Validity: The extent to which a causal conclusion based on a study is warranted, which is determined by the degree to which a study minimizes systematic error (or "bias").
- External Validity: The extent to which the results of a study can be generalized to other situations and to other people.
Validity in Logic[edit]
In logic, validity refers to a property of arguments whereby an argument is valid if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion nevertheless to be false. It is strictly a function of the argument's logical form—not the actual truth of the premises.
Validity in Law[edit]
In legal contexts, validity denotes the legal soundness or force of an argument or statute. For example, a law can be said to have legal validity if it has been enacted in accordance with procedures laid down by the governing body.
Challenges in Establishing Validity[edit]
Establishing validity can be challenging, particularly in fields like psychology where measuring abstract concepts is inherently difficult. Researchers must use a variety of methods and criteria to assess the different aspects of validity, and no single test can fully establish it across all contexts.
See Also[edit]

This article is a philosophy-related stub. You can help WikiMD by expanding it!