Ketchup as a vegetable: Difference between revisions
CSV import |
CSV import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Controversial classification of ketchup as a vegetable in the United States}} | |||
== | ==Ketchup as a Vegetable== | ||
The | [[File:Stammtisch_Ruhrgebiet_Januar_2007_Oberhausen_Pommes.JPG|thumb|right|Ketchup served with fries, illustrating its use as a condiment]] | ||
The term "ketchup as a vegetable" refers to a controversial proposal in the United States during the early 1980s to classify [[ketchup]] as a [[vegetable]] in school lunch programs. This proposal was part of a broader effort to cut costs in the federally funded school lunch program. | |||
== | ===Background=== | ||
In the early 1980s, the [[Reagan administration]] sought to reduce federal spending, including expenditures on the [[National School Lunch Program]]. The administration proposed new regulations that would allow certain condiments, including ketchup and [[pickle]] relish, to be counted as vegetables. This proposal was intended to provide schools with more flexibility in meeting nutritional requirements while reducing costs. | |||
=== | ===Controversy=== | ||
The proposal to classify ketchup as a vegetable was met with widespread criticism and ridicule. Critics argued that condiments like ketchup, which are high in sugar and low in nutritional value, should not be considered equivalent to vegetables such as [[broccoli]] or [[carrot]]s. The proposal became a symbol of perceived insensitivity to children's nutritional needs and was used to criticize the administration's approach to social welfare programs. | |||
=== | ===Outcome=== | ||
Due to the public outcry and negative media coverage, the proposal was eventually withdrawn. The controversy highlighted the challenges of balancing budgetary constraints with the need to provide nutritious meals to children. It also sparked a broader discussion about the role of government in ensuring the health and well-being of students. | |||
== | ===Legacy=== | ||
The | The "ketchup as a vegetable" controversy remains a notable example of how policy decisions can become cultural touchstones. It is often cited in discussions about government policy, nutrition, and education. The incident is remembered as a cautionary tale about the complexities of policy-making and the importance of public perception. | ||
[[File:Stammtisch_Ruhrgebiet_Januar_2007_Oberhausen_Pommes.JPG|thumb|left|Stammtisch Ruhrgebiet Pommes, illustrating the common use of ketchup with fries]] | |||
== | ==Related Pages== | ||
* [[National School Lunch Program]] | |||
* [[Reagan administration]] | |||
* [[Nutrition]] | |||
* [[Condiment]] | |||
{{Portal|Food}} | |||
[[Category:United States federal policy]] | |||
[[Category:Food politics]] | |||
[[Category:1980s in the United States]] | |||
[[Category:Ketchup]] | |||
[[Category: | |||
[[Category: | |||
[[Category: | |||
Latest revision as of 18:56, 23 March 2025
Controversial classification of ketchup as a vegetable in the United States
Ketchup as a Vegetable[edit]
The term "ketchup as a vegetable" refers to a controversial proposal in the United States during the early 1980s to classify ketchup as a vegetable in school lunch programs. This proposal was part of a broader effort to cut costs in the federally funded school lunch program.
Background[edit]
In the early 1980s, the Reagan administration sought to reduce federal spending, including expenditures on the National School Lunch Program. The administration proposed new regulations that would allow certain condiments, including ketchup and pickle relish, to be counted as vegetables. This proposal was intended to provide schools with more flexibility in meeting nutritional requirements while reducing costs.
Controversy[edit]
The proposal to classify ketchup as a vegetable was met with widespread criticism and ridicule. Critics argued that condiments like ketchup, which are high in sugar and low in nutritional value, should not be considered equivalent to vegetables such as broccoli or carrots. The proposal became a symbol of perceived insensitivity to children's nutritional needs and was used to criticize the administration's approach to social welfare programs.
Outcome[edit]
Due to the public outcry and negative media coverage, the proposal was eventually withdrawn. The controversy highlighted the challenges of balancing budgetary constraints with the need to provide nutritious meals to children. It also sparked a broader discussion about the role of government in ensuring the health and well-being of students.
Legacy[edit]
The "ketchup as a vegetable" controversy remains a notable example of how policy decisions can become cultural touchstones. It is often cited in discussions about government policy, nutrition, and education. The incident is remembered as a cautionary tale about the complexities of policy-making and the importance of public perception.
Related Pages[edit]
Lua error: bad argument #2 to 'title.new' (unrecognized namespace name 'Portal').