Logical positivism: Difference between revisions
CSV import |
CSV import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
a philosophy | Logical Positivism | ||
{{ | |||
{{ | Logical positivism, also known as logical empiricism, is a philosophical movement that emerged in the early 20th century. It is characterized by the belief that meaningful statements are either empirically verifiable or analytically true. This movement sought to synthesize the principles of [[empiricism]] with the formal logic of [[mathematics]] and [[philosophy]]. | ||
== Origins and Development == | |||
Logical positivism originated with the [[Vienna Circle]], a group of philosophers and scientists who met in Vienna in the 1920s and 1930s. Key figures in this group included [[Moritz Schlick]], [[Rudolf Carnap]], and [[Otto Neurath]]. They were influenced by the earlier work of [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]], particularly his "[[Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus]]", and by the scientific philosophy of [[Ernst Mach]]. | |||
The movement was also influenced by the development of formal logic, particularly the work of [[Gottlob Frege]] and [[Bertrand Russell]]. Logical positivists sought to apply the precision of mathematical logic to philosophical problems, aiming to eliminate metaphysics and focus on statements that could be empirically tested. | |||
== Core Principles == | |||
Logical positivism is based on several key principles: | |||
* '''[[Verification Principle]]''': A statement is only meaningful if it can be empirically verified or is tautological (true by definition). This principle was central to the logical positivists' rejection of metaphysics. | |||
* '''[[Analytic-Synthetic Distinction]]''': Logical positivists distinguished between analytic statements, which are true by virtue of their meaning (e.g., "All bachelors are unmarried"), and synthetic statements, which are true by virtue of how their meaning relates to the world (e.g., "The cat is on the mat"). | |||
* '''[[Rejection of Metaphysics]]''': Metaphysical statements, which cannot be empirically verified, were considered meaningless by logical positivists. This led to a focus on language and the logical analysis of scientific statements. | |||
* '''[[Emphasis on Science]]''': Logical positivists believed that philosophy should be closely aligned with the sciences, using the methods of empirical investigation and logical analysis. | |||
== Criticisms and Legacy == | |||
Logical positivism faced several criticisms, particularly regarding the verification principle. Critics argued that the principle itself could not be empirically verified, leading to a self-referential problem. Additionally, the strict criteria for meaningfulness excluded many scientific theories that were not directly verifiable. | |||
Despite these criticisms, logical positivism had a significant impact on the philosophy of science and the development of [[analytic philosophy]]. It influenced later movements such as [[scientific realism]] and [[logical empiricism]]. | |||
== Also see == | |||
* [[Vienna Circle]] | |||
* [[Empiricism]] | |||
* [[Analytic philosophy]] | |||
* [[Verificationism]] | |||
* [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]] | |||
{{Philosophy}} | |||
{{Philosophy of science}} | |||
[[Category:Philosophical movements]] | |||
[[Category:Philosophy of science]] | |||
[[Category:Analytic philosophy]] | |||
Latest revision as of 21:56, 11 December 2024
Logical Positivism
Logical positivism, also known as logical empiricism, is a philosophical movement that emerged in the early 20th century. It is characterized by the belief that meaningful statements are either empirically verifiable or analytically true. This movement sought to synthesize the principles of empiricism with the formal logic of mathematics and philosophy.
Origins and Development[edit]
Logical positivism originated with the Vienna Circle, a group of philosophers and scientists who met in Vienna in the 1920s and 1930s. Key figures in this group included Moritz Schlick, Rudolf Carnap, and Otto Neurath. They were influenced by the earlier work of Ludwig Wittgenstein, particularly his "Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus", and by the scientific philosophy of Ernst Mach.
The movement was also influenced by the development of formal logic, particularly the work of Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell. Logical positivists sought to apply the precision of mathematical logic to philosophical problems, aiming to eliminate metaphysics and focus on statements that could be empirically tested.
Core Principles[edit]
Logical positivism is based on several key principles:
- Verification Principle: A statement is only meaningful if it can be empirically verified or is tautological (true by definition). This principle was central to the logical positivists' rejection of metaphysics.
- Analytic-Synthetic Distinction: Logical positivists distinguished between analytic statements, which are true by virtue of their meaning (e.g., "All bachelors are unmarried"), and synthetic statements, which are true by virtue of how their meaning relates to the world (e.g., "The cat is on the mat").
- Rejection of Metaphysics: Metaphysical statements, which cannot be empirically verified, were considered meaningless by logical positivists. This led to a focus on language and the logical analysis of scientific statements.
- Emphasis on Science: Logical positivists believed that philosophy should be closely aligned with the sciences, using the methods of empirical investigation and logical analysis.
Criticisms and Legacy[edit]
Logical positivism faced several criticisms, particularly regarding the verification principle. Critics argued that the principle itself could not be empirically verified, leading to a self-referential problem. Additionally, the strict criteria for meaningfulness excluded many scientific theories that were not directly verifiable.
Despite these criticisms, logical positivism had a significant impact on the philosophy of science and the development of analytic philosophy. It influenced later movements such as scientific realism and logical empiricism.
Also see[edit]