Nondelegation doctrine: Difference between revisions
CSV import |
CSV import |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
[[Category:Legal doctrines and principles]] | [[Category:Legal doctrines and principles]] | ||
{{law-stub}} | {{law-stub}} | ||
{{No image}} | |||
__NOINDEX__ | |||
Latest revision as of 20:14, 17 March 2025
Nondelegation doctrine is a principle in administrative law that holds that legislative bodies cannot delegate their legislative powers to executive agencies or private entities. This doctrine is rooted in the separation of powers principle, which is a fundamental aspect of many constitutional systems, including the United States Constitution.
History[edit]
The nondelegation doctrine has its origins in the early days of the United States, when the Founding Fathers were drafting the Constitution. The doctrine is based on the Vesting Clauses of the Constitution, which state that all legislative powers are vested in the United States Congress, all executive powers in the President of the United States, and all judicial powers in the Supreme Court of the United States.
Application[edit]
In practice, the nondelegation doctrine has been interpreted to mean that while Congress can delegate the authority to make rules and regulations, it cannot delegate the power to make laws. This distinction is often referred to as the "intelligible principle" test, which was first articulated in the Supreme Court case J.W. Hampton Jr. & Co. v. United States.
Criticism and controversy[edit]
The nondelegation doctrine has been the subject of much debate and controversy. Critics argue that it is unrealistic and impractical in the modern administrative state, where the complexity and volume of regulations require expertise and flexibility that Congress may not possess. Supporters, on the other hand, argue that the doctrine is essential for maintaining the separation of powers and preventing the concentration of power in the executive branch.
See also[edit]
