Neurodiversity

Neurodiversity is a concept that appreciates and respects variations in the human brain regarding sociability, learning, attention, mood, and other mental functions as natural and non-pathological variations within the human species. The term was first coined by the sociologist Judy Singer in 1998, and popularized by journalist Harvey Blume. It emerged as a response to traditional perspectives that regarded certain neurodevelopmental disorders as fundamentally pathological, instead favoring the social model of disability. This model contends that societal barriers are the primary factor that disables people. Despite its influence, the neurodiversity paradigm has sparked debate among disability advocates due to varying experiences and needs within the neurodivergent community.

Origin and Development

Neurodiversity as a concept was first introduced by Judy Singer, a sociologist, and an individual on the autism spectrum. In a challenge to prevailing views of certain neurodevelopmental disorders as inherently pathological, Singer and journalist Harvey Blume advanced the notion that these variations are a natural part of human diversity.

The term was quickly embraced by the autism rights movement, which advocates for viewing autism as a difference rather than a disorder, and for creating a society that is accepting and accommodating of these differences.

Principles

The neurodiversity paradigm is based on several key principles:

• Variation: Neurodiversity recognizes the vast variations in human brains and mind as a natural, valuable aspect of human diversity.
• Non-pathology: It challenges the pathological view of certain neurodevelopmental conditions, suggesting these are not diseases or disorders to be cured, but rather different ways of being that should be respected and accepted.
• Social model of disability: This paradigm aligns with the social model of disability, which states that it's societal barriers, not individuals' conditions, that disable people. According to this model, society should adapt to accommodate these differences, rather than individuals being forced to conform to societal norms.

Criticism and Controversy

Despite its influence and popularity within certain circles, the neurodiversity paradigm has not been without criticism. Some disability advocates argue that the concept does not accurately reflect the realities of individuals with high support needs, who may struggle significantly with their conditions. These critics argue that these individuals may indeed require treatment or intervention, and that the neurodiversity movement risks overshadowing these needs in its emphasis on acceptance and accommodation.

Impact on Society and Culture

The neurodiversity movement has had a significant impact on society and culture, particularly in relation to the autism rights movement. It has influenced policies, practices, and attitudes, promoting greater acceptance and accommodation of neurodivergent individuals in various sectors, including education, employment, and healthcare.

The neurodiversity paradigm has also influenced the language used to discuss neurodivergence. The use of identity-first language (e.g., "autistic person" rather than "person with autism") is one example of this influence, reflecting the view that neurodivergence is an integral part of an individual's identity.

See Also

• Autism rights movement
• Social model of disability

This article is a medical stub. You can help WikiMD by expanding it!
Most recent articles Ongoing trials	Wikipedia

• 

  Neurodiversity

• 

  Spikey Cognitive Profile

• 

  Double Empathy Problem