Establishment Clause
Article about the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution
The Establishment Clause is a part of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. It prohibits the government from establishing an official religion or unduly favoring one religion over another. The clause is often interpreted in conjunction with the Free Exercise Clause, which guarantees the right to practice one's religion freely.
Text of the Clause
The Establishment Clause is found in the First Amendment, which states:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."
Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
Historical Background
The Establishment Clause was adopted in 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights. The framers of the Constitution sought to prevent the federal government from establishing a national church, as was common in Europe at the time. This was influenced by the experiences of religious persecution and the desire for religious freedom that many early American settlers had faced.
Interpretation and Application
The interpretation of the Establishment Clause has evolved over time through various Supreme Court decisions. The Court has developed several tests to determine whether a government action violates the Establishment Clause.
The Lemon Test
One of the most well-known tests is the Lemon Test, established in the 1971 case Lemon v. Kurtzman. The test has three prongs:
- The government's action must have a secular legislative purpose.
- The action must not have the primary effect of either advancing or inhibiting religion.
- The action must not result in an "excessive government entanglement" with religion.
The Endorsement Test
Another approach is the Endorsement Test, which asks whether a reasonable observer would view the government's action as endorsing or disapproving of religion.
The Coercion Test
The Coercion Test considers whether the government action coerces individuals to support or participate in religion against their will.
Landmark Cases
Several landmark cases have shaped the interpretation of the Establishment Clause:
- Engel v. Vitale (1962): The Court ruled that it is unconstitutional for state officials to compose an official school prayer and encourage its recitation in public schools.
- Abington School District v. Schempp (1963): The Court held that school-sponsored Bible reading in public schools is unconstitutional.
- Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971): Established the Lemon Test for determining violations of the Establishment Clause.
- Lynch v. Donnelly (1984): The Court upheld the display of a nativity scene by a city, ruling that it did not violate the Establishment Clause.
Contemporary Issues
The Establishment Clause continues to be a source of debate and litigation. Issues such as school vouchers, religious displays on public property, and the role of religion in public schools frequently arise in legal challenges.
Related pages
Transform your life with W8MD's budget GLP-1 injections from $125.
W8MD offers a medical weight loss program to lose weight in Philadelphia. Our physician-supervised medical weight loss provides:
- Most insurances accepted or discounted self-pay rates. We will obtain insurance prior authorizations if needed.
- Generic GLP1 weight loss injections from $125 for the starting dose.
- Also offer prescription weight loss medications including Phentermine, Qsymia, Diethylpropion, Contrave etc.
NYC weight loss doctor appointments
Start your NYC weight loss journey today at our NYC medical weight loss and Philadelphia medical weight loss clinics.
- Call 718-946-5500 to lose weight in NYC or for medical weight loss in Philadelphia 215-676-2334.
- Tags:NYC medical weight loss, Philadelphia lose weight Zepbound NYC, Budget GLP1 weight loss injections, Wegovy Philadelphia, Wegovy NYC, Philadelphia medical weight loss, Brookly weight loss and Wegovy NYC
|
WikiMD's Wellness Encyclopedia |
| Let Food Be Thy Medicine Medicine Thy Food - Hippocrates |
Medical Disclaimer: WikiMD is not a substitute for professional medical advice. The information on WikiMD is provided as an information resource only, may be incorrect, outdated or misleading, and is not to be used or relied on for any diagnostic or treatment purposes. Please consult your health care provider before making any healthcare decisions or for guidance about a specific medical condition. WikiMD expressly disclaims responsibility, and shall have no liability, for any damages, loss, injury, or liability whatsoever suffered as a result of your reliance on the information contained in this site. By visiting this site you agree to the foregoing terms and conditions, which may from time to time be changed or supplemented by WikiMD. If you do not agree to the foregoing terms and conditions, you should not enter or use this site. See full disclaimer.
Credits:Most images are courtesy of Wikimedia commons, and templates, categories Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY SA or similar.
Contributors: Prab R. Tumpati, MD