Betancourt v. Trinitas Hospital

Betancourt v. Trinitas Hospital (pronunciation: beh-tan-court vee trin-it-as hos-pi-tal) is a landmark legal case in the field of medical ethics and patient rights.

Etymology

The case is named after the plaintiff, Ruben Betancourt, and the defendant, Trinitas Hospital, located in Elizabeth, New Jersey.

Background

In 2008, Ruben Betancourt, a 73-year-old man, was admitted to Trinitas Hospital for surgery to remove a kidney tumor. Post-surgery, Betancourt suffered from a series of medical complications, including brain damage that left him in a vegetative state. The hospital sought to remove Betancourt's life support, arguing that further treatment would be medically futile. Betancourt's daughter, Jacqueline Betancourt, disagreed with the hospital's assessment and took the case to court.

Court Case

The case, Betancourt v. Trinitas Hospital, was heard in the Superior Court of New Jersey in 2009. The court ruled in favor of the hospital, stating that the hospital had the right to make decisions about end-of-life care based on medical judgment. This case set a precedent for future cases involving disputes between families and medical professionals over end-of-life decisions.

Impact

The Betancourt v. Trinitas Hospital case has had a significant impact on the field of medical ethics, particularly in discussions about patient autonomy, end-of-life care, and medical futility. It has also influenced policies and practices in hospitals across the United States.

Related Terms

External links

Medical encyclopedia article on Betancourt v. Trinitas Hospital
Wikipedia's article - Betancourt v. Trinitas Hospital

This WikiMD article is a stub. You can help make it a full article.

Languages: - East Asian 中文, 日本, 한국어, South Asian हिन्दी, Urdu, বাংলা, తెలుగు, தமிழ், ಕನ್ನಡ,
Southeast Asian Indonesian, Vietnamese, Thai, မြန်မာဘာသာ, European español, Deutsch, français, русский, português do Brasil, Italian, polski