|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{good article}} | | {{Short description|Postmortem fetal extrusion}} |
| | {{Medical condition (new)}} |
|
| |
|
| <youtube>
| | '''Coffin birth''', also known as '''postmortem fetal extrusion''', is a rare phenomenon that occurs when a deceased pregnant woman expels a fetus from the uterus after death. This event is typically associated with the buildup of gases within the decomposing body, which increases intra-abdominal pressure and forces the fetus out through the vaginal canal. |
| title='''{{PAGENAME}}'''
| |
| movie_url=http://www.youtube.com/v/qe9l-xtBX0w
| |
| &rel=1
| |
| embed_source_url=http://www.youtube.com/v/qe9l-xtBX0w
| |
| &rel=1
| |
| wrap = yes
| |
| width=750
| |
| height=600
| |
| </youtube>
| |
|
| |
|
| '''Coffin birth''', also known as '''postmortem fetal extrusion''',<ref name=lasso>Lasso ''et al.'' 2009.</ref><ref name=schulz>Schulz 2005.</ref> is the expulsion of a [[viability (fetal)|nonviable]] [[fetus]] through the [[vagina]]l opening of the decomposing body of a deceased pregnant woman as a result of the increasing pressure of intra-abdominal gases. This kind of [[postmortem]] delivery occurs very rarely during the [[decomposition]] of a body. The practice of [[embalming|chemical preservation]], whereby chemical preservatives and [[disinfectant]] solutions are pumped into a body to replace natural body fluids (and the [[bacteria]] that reside therein), have made the occurrence of "coffin birth" so rare that the topic is rarely mentioned in international medical discourse.
| | ==Pathophysiology== |
| | Coffin birth occurs due to the natural process of decomposition. After death, the body undergoes [[putrefaction]], during which bacteria break down tissues, producing gases such as methane, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide. These gases accumulate within the abdominal cavity, increasing pressure. In a pregnant woman, this pressure can be sufficient to expel the fetus from the uterus through the [[vagina]]. |
|
| |
|
| Typically during the decomposition of a human body, naturally occurring bacteria in the organs of the abdominal cavity (such as the [[stomach]] and [[intestines]]) generate gases as by-products of [[metabolism]], which causes the body to swell. In some cases, the confined pressure of the gases can squeeze the [[uterus]] (the womb), even forcing it downward, and it may [[wikt:eversion|turn inside-out]] and be forced out of the body through the vaginal opening (a process called ''[[prolapse]]''). If a fetus is contained within the uterus, it could therefore be expelled from the mother's body through the vaginal opening when the uterus turns inside-out, in a process that, to outward appearances, mimics [[childbirth]]. The main differences lie in the state of the mother and fetus and the mechanism of delivery: in the event of natural, live childbirth, the mother's [[Uterine contraction|contractions]] thin and shorten the cervix to expel the infant from the womb; in a case of coffin birth, built-up gas pressure within the [[putrefaction|putrefied]] body of a pregnant woman pushes the dead fetus from the body of the mother.
| | The phenomenon is more likely to occur in the second or third trimester of pregnancy, when the fetus is larger and the uterus is more distended. The process of fetal extrusion can take several days to weeks after the death of the mother, depending on environmental conditions such as temperature and humidity, which affect the rate of decomposition. |
|
| |
|
| Cases have been recorded by medical authorities since the 16th century, though some [[archaeological]] cases provide evidence for its occurrence in many periods of human history. While cases of postmortem fetal expulsion have always been rare, the phenomenon has been recorded under disparate circumstances and is occasionally seen in a modern forensic context when the body of a pregnant woman lies undisturbed and undiscovered for some time following death. There are also cases whereby a fetus may become separated from the body of the pregnant woman about the time of death or during decomposition, though because those cases are not consistent with the processes described here, they are not considered true cases of postmortem fetal extrusion.
| | ==Historical Context== |
| | Coffin birth has been documented in historical records and archaeological findings. In the past, it was often misunderstood and surrounded by superstition. The term "coffin birth" originates from the observation of this phenomenon in bodies that were exhumed after burial. In some cases, the expulsion of the fetus was mistaken for a live birth occurring postmortem, leading to various myths and legends. |
|
| |
|
| <youtube>
| | ==Modern Understanding== |
| title='''{{PAGENAME}}'''
| | Today, coffin birth is understood as a natural consequence of decomposition in a pregnant body. It is a rare occurrence due to modern practices of embalming and refrigeration, which slow down the decomposition process. In forensic pathology, the occurrence of coffin birth can provide information about the time of death and the conditions in which the body was kept. |
| movie_url=http://www.youtube.com/v/aBCqPTk8BNI
| |
| &rel=1
| |
| embed_source_url=http://www.youtube.com/v/aBCqPTk8BNI
| |
| &rel=1
| |
| wrap = yes
| |
| width=750
| |
| height=600
| |
| </youtube>
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Causes== | | ==Forensic Implications== |
| {{Signs of death}}
| | In forensic investigations, the occurrence of coffin birth can complicate the determination of the cause and time of death. It is important for forensic pathologists to recognize the signs of postmortem fetal extrusion to avoid misinterpretation of the findings. The presence of a fetus outside the body of a deceased pregnant woman should be carefully documented and analyzed in the context of the overall decomposition process. |
| The cause{{ref|a|Note a}} of postmortem fetal extrusion is not completely understood, as the event is neither predictable nor replicable under experimental conditions. Evidence has accumulated opportunistically and direct observation is [[Serendipity|serendipitous]].<ref name=schulz/> While it is possible that more than one cause can produce the same result, there is an accepted hypothesis,<ref name=schulz/><ref name=gould/> based on established research in the fields of [[biochemistry]] and forensic [[taphonomy]],{{ref|b|Note b}}<ref name=ubelaker>Ubelaker 1997: 80.</ref> and further supported by observational research, that accounts for the taphonomic mechanisms that would result in the most often encountered cases of postmortem extrusion of a non-viable fetus.
| |
|
| |
|
| Typically, as a dead body [[decomposition|decomposes]], body tissues become depleted of oxygen and the body begins to [[putrefaction|putrefy]]; [[anaerobic bacteria]] in the gastrointestinal tract proliferate and as a result of increased [[metabolism|metabolic]] activity, release gases such as [[carbon dioxide]], [[methane]], and [[hydrogen sulfide]].<ref name=carter>Carter ''et al.'' 2007.</ref><ref name=gill>Gill-King 1997: 93–108.</ref> These bacteria [[Bacteria#Secretion|secrete]] exoenzymes{{ref|c|Note c}} to [[digestion|break down]] body cells and [[protein]]s for ingestion which thus weakens organ [[tissue (biology)|tissue]]s. Increasing pressure forces the [[diffusion]] of excessive gases into the weakened tissues where they enter the [[circulatory system]] and spread to other parts of the body, causing both torso and limbs to become [[Decomposition#Bloat|bloated]]. These decompositional processes weaken the structural integrity of organs by separating [[necrosis|necrotizing]] tissue layers.<ref name=gill/> Bloating usually begins from two to five days after death, depending on external temperature, humidity, and other environmental conditions.<ref>Galloway 1997.</ref> As the volume of gas increases, the pressure begins to force various body fluids to exude from all natural orifices.<ref>Carter and Tibbett 2008.</ref> It is at this point during the decomposition of a pregnant body that [[Amniotic sac|amniotic membranes]] become stretched and separated, and intra-abdominal gas pressure may force the [[wikt:eversion|eversion]] and [[prolapse]] of the [[uterus]],{{ref|d|Note d}} which would result in the expulsion of the fetus through the vaginal canal.<ref name=knight>Saukko and Knight 2004: 65.</ref> It has been observed that the bodies of [[parity (medicine)|multiparous]] women{{ref|e|Note e}} are more likely to spontaneously expel the fetus during decomposition than those who died during their first [[pregnancy]], because of the more elastic nature of the [[cervix]].<ref name=williams1904/>
| | ==Related Pages== |
| | * [[Decomposition]] |
| | * [[Forensic pathology]] |
| | * [[Pregnancy]] |
| | * [[Putrefaction]] |
|
| |
|
| ==History==
| |
| Numerous documented cases of postmortem fetal extrusion were described in the medical compendium ''Anomalies and Curiosities of Medicine'', first published in 1896.<ref name=gould>Gould and Pyle 1997.</ref> The earliest presented case occurred in 1551 when a pregnant woman was tried and [[hanging|hanged]] by the courts of the [[Spanish Inquisition]]. Four hours after her death, and while the body still hung by the neck, two dead infants were seen to fall free of the body. This is unusual for the short amount of time elapsed between death and the postmortem delivery. As no information is given regarding other ambient circumstances, it is unclear whether the onset of putrefaction was accelerated, or if other causal factors were at work.<ref name=ubelaker/> In the city of [[Brussels]], in 1633, a woman died in convulsions and three days later a fetus was spontaneously expelled. In [[Weissenfels]], in 1861, postmortem fetal extrusion was observed sixty hours after the death of a pregnant woman. Other cases are described, though only a few describe the unexpected discovery of fetal remains following exhumation. Most cases occurred before burial; in some of these, the body was in the casket while in other cases the body was still on its deathbed or on a [[bier]].<ref name=gould/>
| |
|
| |
| During the late 19th century, modern [[embalming]] techniques were developed, whereby preservative and disinfectant chemical compounds (such as [[formaldehyde]]) are pumped into a body, flushing out the body's natural fluids, and with them the bacteria that flourish during putrefaction and generate the gases that comprise the active force behind the expulsion of the fetus.<ref name=dinn>Dinn 1999: 15-17.</ref> However, the phenomenon was still recognized by medical science and in 1904, John Whitridge Williams wrote a textbook on obstetric medicine that included a section on "coffin birth".<ref name=williams1904>Williams 1904:755–756.</ref> Although the text has remained an important reference in obstetrics, the subject, whether called "coffin birth" or "postmortem fetal extrusion", was excluded by its 13th edition in 1966,<ref>Eastman and Hellman 1966.</ref> and was not mentioned in the edition published in 2009.<ref name=williams2009>Cunningham ''et al.'' 2009.</ref> The subject was discussed in German medical literature during the 20th century,<ref>Jungmichel and Musick 1941.</ref><ref>Panning 1941.</ref><ref>Prokop and Göhler 1976: 118.</ref><ref>Strauch 1921.</ref> though more detailed case reports in the forensic literature have been published recently.<ref name=lasso/><ref name=schulz/>
| |
|
| |
| In 2005, the body of a 34-year-old woman, eight months pregnant, was discovered in her apartment in [[Hamburg, Germany]].<ref name=schulz/> The body was bloated and discolored, and upon initial examination, it was found that the head of the fetus had made its appearance in the vaginal opening. At [[autopsy]], medical examiners found that both the head and shoulders of the fetus had emerged, and concluded that it was a case of postmortem fetal extrusion in progress. The woman, who had given birth twice before, had died of a heroin overdose.<ref name=schulz/> The case was unusual and serendipitous, as it was the first modern case in which medical practitioners were able to document a case of postmortem fetal extrusion in progress.<ref name=schulz/>
| |
|
| |
| In 2008, the body of a 38-year-old woman, seven months pregnant, was discovered in an open field four days after she had disappeared from her residence in [[Panama]].<ref name=lasso/> A plastic bag had been left over her head, and she had been gagged; the case was ruled a homicide. The body had suffered from the tropical heat and high humidity, and was bloated and highly discolored. At autopsy, the remains of the fetus were discovered in the woman's undergarments. Although the fetus was in a similar state of decomposition, the [[umbilical cord]] was intact and still attached to the [[placenta]] inside the uterus. This was the first forensic case in which it could be concluded that coffin birth had occurred based on the position of the bodies and the clear attachment of the umbilical cord to the un-expelled placenta.<ref name=lasso/>
| |
|
| |
| In 2019, the autopsy reports in the case of the [[Watts family homicides]] in August 2018 revealed that Shanann Watts (who had been 15 weeks pregnant at the time of her murder) had been found in a shallow grave and that the fetus had been expelled from her body, along with the placenta and umbilical cord.{{citation needed|date=March 2019}}
| |
|
| |
| ===Bioarchaeology===
| |
| Postmortem fetal extrusion can be very difficult to recognize once a body has undergone complete [[skeletonization (forensics)|skeletonization]], and [[bioarchaeology|bioarchaeologists]] are often very cautious about asserting the presence of this phenomenon.<ref name=lewis>Lewis 2007: 34–37, 91.</ref><ref name=wells>Wells 1975: 1237.</ref> There are numerous cultural reasons why a mother and an infant might be interred together, so the joint presence of neonatal remains and an adult female is not taken as conclusive evidence of postmortem fetal extrusion;<ref name=lewis/><ref name=wells/> however, there have been excavated burials where the position of a set of fetal remains relative to those of an adult female supported this [[hypothesis]]. There are a few general guidelines when an archaeologist is assessing the placement of the fetus and the adult:<ref name=lewis/>
| |
| # If the fetal remains are found in a [[fetal position]] and are wholly within the pelvic cavity of the adult, the fetus died and was interred before delivery. The pregnant woman may therefore have died due to [[Dystocia|labor complications]].
| |
| # If the infant is found alongside the adult, with the head oriented in the same direction as the adult, then the infant was delivered, whether naturally or by caesarian incision, around the time of death, and thereafter interred.
| |
| ## Delivered infants have also been interred between or alongside the [[tibia]]e (shins), but the infant is still oriented in the same direction as the adult.
| |
| ## If the majority of the fetal remains are in the pelvic cavity of the adult, yet the legs are extended and/or the cranium lies among the [[rib]]s, then the infant may have been delivered and then placed on top of the mother's torso before burial. As both bodies skeletonized, the infant's bones would have settled among the mother's ribs and [[vertebrae]].
| |
| # If the fetal remains are complete and in a position inferior to and in-line with the [[pelvic outlet]], with the head oriented opposite to that of the mother (toward the foot of the coffin or grave), then there is the possibility of coffin birth.<ref name=lewis/><ref name=fingal>O’Donovan ''et al.'' 2009: 70–71.</ref>
| |
| ## Evidence for postmortem fetal extrusion may be less ambiguous when the fetal remains are found to lie within the pelvic outlet of the adult, thus indicating that partial extrusion had occurred during decomposition.<ref name=hw1975>Hawkes and Wells 1975.</ref><ref name=moller>Møller-Christensen 1982.</ref>
| |
|
| |
| In 1975, it was reported that during the excavation of a medieval cemetery in [[Kings Worthy]], [[England]], fetal remains appeared to lie within the [[Vagina#Childbirth|birth canal]] of the skeleton of a young woman, with the fetal cranium external to the pelvic outlet and between the two [[femur|femora]] (thigh bones) and the fetal leg bones clearly within the [[pelvic cavity]].<ref name=hw1975/> Other cases of coffin birth at archaeological sites have been described, such as in 1978 at a [[Neolithic]] site in Germany,<ref name=kaiser>Kaiser 1978.</ref> at a medieval site in [[Denmark]] in 1982,<ref name=moller/> and in 2009 at an [[History of Ireland (400–800)|Early Christian period]] site at [[Fingal]], [[Ireland]].<ref name=fingal/> A coffin birth was also described in a 2011 episode of the BBC show ''[[History Cold Case]]'', featuring the Roman era remains of a woman and three neonates discovered near [[Baldock]], [[Hertfordshire]].<ref name=hcc>[http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b012s3fw "The Woman and Three Babies".] BBC Two.</ref> Another was identified in 2006 in a 14th-century Black Death cemetery in [[Genoa]], Italy.<ref name=cbb>Cesana ''et al.'' 2017</ref>
| |
|
| |
| ==Applicability of diagnosis==
| |
| Because postmortem fetal extrusion is so rare, and occurs under highly idiosyncratic conditions regarding the individual and the ambient environment,<ref name=gould/><ref name=carter/><ref name=williams1904/><ref name=lewis/> this phenomenon has not been studied for possible applications to forensic investigation. Even if the study of postmortem fetal extrusion could lead to improved investigative methods, experimental research would be highly problematic. At present, [[forensic science|forensic scientists]] have at their disposal an array of established techniques and procedures for a death investigation at the stages of decomposition when postmortem fetal extrusion typically occurs.<ref name=knight/>
| |
|
| |
| In archaeology, the study of mortuary context, that is, the interpretation of the postmortem treatment of the dead, whether an individual or as pertains to patterns within a group, has led to the development of hypotheses on social status and/or hierarchy regarding many cultures, ancient and extant.<ref name=moller/><ref>Larsen 1999: 126, 127, 131.</ref><ref>Bell 1992.</ref><ref>Solecki 1975.</ref><ref>Robb ''et al.'' 1992.</ref> In addition, the determination of whether or not delivery actually occurred before death has a bearing on analyses of the mother's population, as the concentration of [[trace element]]s differ markedly between the skeletons of prepartum adult women (before giving birth) and women who are [[lactation|lactating]]; the identification of coffin birth would lead to more accurate analyses of the number of lactating women in a population or the rate of maternal mortality.<ref>Lewis 2007: 37.</ref> It is therefore necessary for investigators to be able to recognize postmortem fetal extrusion when encountered in an excavated burial.<ref name=wells/><ref name=ortner>Ortner 2003: 176.</ref>
| |
|
| |
| ==Comparable phenomena==
| |
| There are also many cases where the remains of the fetus are found separate from the body of the mother, but expulsion was not through the birth canal, and separation of the two bodies may have been influenced by external environmental factors. The process of separation is so unusual that a specific term for the phenomenon may not have been proposed to the scientific community. These cases may have comparable results, but they are not cases of postmortem fetal extrusion.
| |
|
| |
| In April 2003, the body of [[Laci Peterson]] washed up on a shore near [[San Francisco Bay]]; she had been pregnant when she disappeared four months earlier, and the fetus she had been carrying was discovered on a separate beach. When questioned by the media, medical authorities initially speculated that a "coffin birth" might have occurred.<ref>''USA Today'' 15 April 2003.</ref> However, at autopsy the cervix was found to be in a [[External orifice of the uterus|prepartum condition]]. Medical examiners later concluded that while Peterson's body was in the bay, the skin over the abdominal cavity had ruptured due to natural decompositional processes. Seawater entered the abdominal cavity and washed out most of the internal organs, along with the fetus.<ref>Fleeman 2003: 141, 142.</ref>
| |
|
| |
| In 2007, a 23-year-old woman in India, over eight months pregnant, hanged herself after [[Uterine contraction|contractions]] had begun.<ref name=behera>Behera ''et al.'' 2007.</ref> A viable infant was spontaneously delivered unassisted from the woman's body, which was suspended by the neck. The healthy infant was found on the floor, still tethered to the body of the mother by the umbilical cord. The primary cause of the delivery was the otherwise normal contractions, which had begun before death, and was therefore not related to processes of decomposition.<ref name=gill/><ref name=behera/> While this is not postmortem fetal extrusion, it may be referred to as a case of ''postmortem delivery'', a term which is applied to a broad range of techniques and phenomena with a resultant delivery of a live infant.<ref>Lopez-Zeno ''et al.'' 1990.</ref>
| |
|
| |
| In 2008, in Germany, a 23-year-old woman in her third [[Pregnancy#Physiology|trimester]] was involved in a motor vehicle accident, and died; the non-viable fetus was found between her feet.<ref name=vennemann>Vennemann ''et al.'' 2008.</ref> The vehicle caught fire following initial impact . The woman was unable to escape due to internal injuries and burned to death. Investigators came to the conclusion that the extreme heat of the fire burned away [[epidermis (skin)|epidermal]] and [[subcutaneous tissue]] around the abdominal cavity, after which the [[Anatomical terms of location#Anterior and posterior|anterior aspect]] of the uterus ruptured, causing the fetus to spill out of the uterine cavity and land on the floor between the woman's feet. The umbilical cord was still intact and connected the fetus to the placenta through the ruptured wall of the uterus. Unlike the woman, who suffered [[Burn#By depth|fourth-degree]] burns over her entire body, the body of the fetus was relatively undamaged.<ref name=vennemann/> Because the primary cause of separation from the mother's body was thermally induced traumatic rupture of the abdominal and uterine cavities; traumatic separation was not related to normal decompositional processes; and expulsion of the fetus did not involve passage through the birth canal, this is not considered a case of postmortem fetal extrusion.<ref name=vennemann/>
| |
|
| |
| ==In animals==
| |
| Whales can be subject to postmortem fetal extrusion. Many species float when dead, due to the gases of putrefaction. [[Drift whale]]s that wash up on shore, and the carcasses of [[whaling|hunted whales]], if not [[flensing|flensed]] (stripped of [[blubber]]) and processed in a timely manner, posed a risk. [[Tim Flannery]] wrote that "A rotting whale could fill with gas to bursting, ejecting a fetus the size of a motor vehicle with sufficient force to kill a man."<ref>[http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/feb/09/minds-whales/?pagination=false "On the Minds of the Whales"] by Tim Flannery, NYRB, 9 February 2012</ref>
| |
|
| |
| ==See also==
| |
| {{Portal|Archaeology|Medicine}}
| |
| * [[Childbirth]]
| |
| * [[Osteology]]
| |
| * [[Posthumous birth]]
| |
| * [[Stillbirth]]
| |
|
| |
| ==Footnotes==
| |
| {{reflist|group="Note"}}
| |
| :a.{{note|a}} That is, the uterus could be forced partially or completely inside-out (''eversion''), and fall or be forced out of the vaginal opening (''prolapse'').
| |
| :b.{{note|b}} The ''etiology'' is a study of the specific processes and conditions that result in a particular medical condition.
| |
| :c.{{note|c}} ''Forensic taphonomy'' is the study of the processes of decomposition.
| |
| :d.{{note|d}} ''Exoenzymes'' are [[enzyme]]s that function outside the [[cell membrane]]s of bacteria.
| |
| :e.{{note|e}} ''Multiparous women'' are those who have experienced vaginal childbirth two or more times.
| |
|
| |
| ==References==
| |
| {{reflist|3}}
| |
|
| |
| ==Bibliography==
| |
| * {{Cite journal| author1=Behera C |author2= Rantji R |author3= Dogra TD |year= 2007 |title= Full term normal delivery following suicidal hanging |journal= Forensic Science International |volume= 169 |pages= e1–e2| doi=10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.01.018 |pmid=17324544}}
| |
| * {{cite web |last= Bell |first= Edward |publisher= University of Florida |year= 1992 |title= The Historical Archeology of Mortuary Behavior: Coffin Hardware from Uxbridge, Massachusetts |url= http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/davidson/Arch%20of%20Death/Week%2013/Bell%201990.pdf |format= PDF |accessdate= 17 April 2011 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20120312003139/http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/davidson/Arch%20of%20Death/Week%2013/Bell%201990.pdf |archive-date= 12 March 2012 |dead-url= yes }}
| |
| * {{cite book |last1=Carter |first1=DO |last2= Tibbett |first2=M. |year= 2008 |chapter= Cadaver Decomposition and Soil: Processes |editor1-first= M. |editor1-last= Tibbett |editor2-first= D.O. |editor2-last=Carter |title= Soil Analysis in Forensic Taphonomy |publisher= CRC Press |place=New York |pages= 29–51 }}
| |
| * {{cite journal |last1=Carter |first1=DO |last2= Yellowlees |first2=D |last3= Tibbett |first3=M |year= 2007 |title= Cadaver decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems |journal= Naturwissenschaften |volume=94 |pages= 12–24|bibcode = 2007NW.....94...12C |doi = 10.1007/s00114-006-0159-1 |pmid=17091303|url=http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1256&context=entomologyfacpub }}
| |
| * {{cite journal |first1=D. |last1=Cesana |first2=O.J. |last2=Benedictow |first3=R. |last3=Bianucci |year=2017 |title=The origin and early spread of the Black Death in Italy: first evidence of plague victims from 14th-century Liguria (northern Italy) |journal=Anthropological Science |doi=10.1537/ase.161011}}
| |
| * {{Cite book |author1=Cunningham F |author2= Leveno K |author3= Bloom S |author4= Hauth J| author5= Rouse D |author6= Spong C. |year= 2009 |title= Williams Obstetrics |edition= 23 |publisher= McGraw-Hill Medical |place= New York}}
| |
| * {{Cite book |last =Dinn|first= Peter| title= Embalming |year=1999 |publisher= Toscan Dinn Funerals | location= Weston, Australia |pages=}}
| |
| * {{Cite book |author1=Eastman, Nicholson J. |author2= Hellman, Louis M. Eastman |year= 1966 |title= Williams Obstetrics |edition= 13 |publisher= Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc |place= New York }}
| |
| * {{Cite book| last=Fleeman |first=M. |year= 2003 |title= Laci: Inside the Laci Peterson Murder |publisher= St. Martin's Press |place= New York| isbn=0-312-99585-7 |pages=}}
| |
| * {{Cite book|last= Galloway |first=A. |year= 1997 |editor1-first=WD| editor1-last=Haglund |editor2-first=MH| editor2-last= Sorg |title= Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains |publisher=CRC Press| place=New York|chapter= The Process of Decomposition: A Model from the Arizona-Sonoran Desert |pages=139–150}}
| |
| * {{Cite book|last= Gill-King |first=H |year= 1997 |editor1-first=WD| editor1-last=Haglund |editor2-first=MH| editor2-last= Sorg |title= Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains |publisher=CRC Press| place=New York|chapter= Chemical and Ultrastructural Aspects of Decomposition |pages= 93–108 }}
| |
| * {{Cite book |last1= Gould |first1= George M. |last2= Pyle |first2= Walter L. |year= 1997 |title= Anomalies and Curiosities of Medicine |chapter= Obstetric Anomalies |publisher= The World Wide School |place= Seattle |url= http://www.worldwideschool.org/library/books/tech/medicine/AnomaliesandCuriositiesofMedicine/chap3.html |accessdate= 17 April 2011 |isbn= 0-585-00884-1 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080228051430/http://www.worldwideschool.org/library/books/tech/medicine/AnomaliesandCuriositiesofMedicine/chap3.html |archive-date= 28 February 2008 |dead-url= yes |df= dmy-all }}
| |
| * {{Cite journal| author1=Hawkes S. |author2= Wells C. |year= 1975 |title= An Anglo-Saxon obstetric calamity from Kingsworthy, Hampshire |journal= Medical and Biological Illustration |volume=25 |pages= 47–51 }}
| |
| * {{Cite journal|author1=Jungmichel G. |author2= Musick N. |year= 1941 |title= Über Sarggeburt |journal= Deutsche Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Gerichtliche Medizin|language=German |trans-title=About Coffin Birth| volume= 34 |pages= 236–56 |doi=10.1007/bf01793810}}
| |
| * {{Cite journal| last= Kaiser |first= G. |year= 1978 |title= Prähistorischen sarggeburt |trans-title= A Prehistoric Coffin Birth |language= German |journal= Beitrage zur Gerichtlichen Medizin |volume= 36 |pages= 197–201| pmid= 718611 }}
| |
| * {{Cite book | last =Larsen |first=Clark Spencer |title= Bioarchaeology: Interpreting Behavior from the Human Skeleton |year=1999 |publisher= Cambridge University Press |place= Cambridge, UK | isbn =0-521-65834-9 |pages= }}
| |
| * {{Cite journal| author1=Lasso E |author2= Santos M |author3= Rico A |author4= Pachar JV |author5= Lucena J |year= 2009 |title= Expulsión Fetal Postmortem |journal= Cuadernos de Medicina Forense |volume= 15 |pages= 77–81 |language=Spanish}}
| |
| * {{Cite book |last= Lewis |first= Mary E. |year= 2007 |title= The Bioarchaeology of Children: Perspectives from Biological and Forensic Anthropology |publisher= Cambridge University Press |place= New York |isbn= 0-521-83602-6 |pages= 34–37, 91}}
| |
| * {{Cite journal |author1= Lopez-Zeno JA |author2= Carlo WA |author3= O’Grady JP |author4= Fanaroff AA |year= 1990 |title=Infant Survival Following Delayed Postmortem Cesarean Delivery |journal= Obstetrics and Gynecology |volume= 76 |pages= 991–992 |pmid= 2216275 |issue= 5 Pt 2 |doi=10.1097/00006250-199011001-00038}}
| |
| * {{Citation |last= Møller-Christensen |first=V. |year= 1982 |title= Aebelholt Kloster |trans-title= Aebelholt Monastery |language= Danish |publisher= Nationalmuseet |place= Copenhagen}}
| |
| * {{Cite book|last1=O’Donovan |first1=Edmond |last2= Geber |first2=Jonny | first3=Christine (ed.) |last3=Baker| title= Axes, Warriors and Windmills: Recent archaeological discoveries in North Fingal |publisher= Fingal County Council |year=2009 |pages= |chapter= Archaeological excavations on Mount Gamble Hill: stories from the first Christians in Swords |isbn= 978-0-9549103-9-6 }}
| |
| * {{Cite book| last= Ortner |first= DJ |year= 2003 |title= Identification of Pathological Conditions in Human Skeletal Remains |edition= 2 |publisher= Academic Press |place= San Diego|page=}}
| |
| * {{Cite journal |author= Panning G. |year=1941 |title= Sarggeburt |journal= Deutsche Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Gerichtliche Medizin |language=German |trans-title=Coffin Birth |volume= 34 |pages= 257–64 |doi=10.1007/bf01793811}}
| |
| * {{Cite book|author1= Prokop O. |author2= Göhler W. |title= Forensische Medizin |year=1976 |language=German |trans-title=Forensic Medicine |edition= 3 |publisher= Gustav Fischer |place= Stuttgart, Germany }}
| |
| * {{cite journal |first=John |last=Robb |first2=Renzo |last2=Bigazzi |first3=Luca |last3=Lazzarini |first4=Caterina |last4=Scarsini |first5=Fiorenza |last5=Sonego |title=Social status and biological status: A comparison of grave goods and skeletal indicators from Pontecagnano |journal=[[American Journal of Physical Anthropology]] |volume=115 |issue=3 |pages=213–222 |year=2001 |doi=10.1002/ajpa.1076 }}
| |
| * {{Cite book| last1=Saukko |first1=PJ |last2= Knight |first2= B. |year= 2004 |title= Knight’s Forensic Pathology |edition= 3 |publisher= Hodder Arnold |place= London| isbn=0-340-76044-3 |page=}}
| |
| * {{Cite journal | year= 2005 |title= Postmortem fetal extrusion in a case of maternal heroin intoxication|journal= Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology |volume= 1 |issue= 4|pages= 273–6 |last1=Schulz |first1=F |last2= Püschel |first2=K |last3= Tsokos |first3= M. | doi= 10.1385/FSMP:1:4:273 }}
| |
| * {{Cite journal|first=Ralph S. |last=Solecki |date=November 1975 |title=Shanidar IV, a Neanderthal Flower Burial in Northern Iraq |journal =[[Science (journal)|Science]] |volume=190 |issue=4217 |pages=880–881 |id= |bibcode=1975Sci...190..880S| doi = 10.1126/science.190.4217.880}}
| |
| * {{Cite journal | author= Strauch| title= Über Sarggeburt|year=1921| language=German|trans-title=About Coffin Birth|journal= Zentralbl Gynäkol |volume=23 |pages= 828–829}}
| |
| * {{Cite book| last=Ubelaker |first= Douglas H. |chapter= Taphonomic Applications in Forensic Anthropology | title= Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains|editor1= William D. Haglund|editor2= Marcella H. Sorg| year=1997|publisher=CRC Press|place=Boca Raton, FL| isbn= 0-8493-9434-1 |pages=77–90 }}
| |
| * {{cite news |author= ''USA Today'' |title= Theories on How Dead Woman Could Deliver Baby |newspaper= USA Today|date= 15 April 2003 |page= A-4}}
| |
| * {{Cite journal |author1= Vennemann B |author2= Bohnert M |author3= Pollak S |author4= Perdekamp MG |year= 2008 |title= Postmortem "delivery" in a pregnant fire victim |journal= International Journal of Legal Medicine |volume= 122 |pages= 327–331 |doi= 10.1007/s00414-008-0234-6 |pmid= 18504598 |issue= 4 }}
| |
| * {{Cite journal| last=Wells |first= C. |year= 1975 |title= Ancient Obstetric Hazards and Female Mortality |journal= Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine |volume=51 |issue=11 |pages= 1235–1249| pmid=1101997| pmc=1749741 }}
| |
| * {{Cite book |last= Williams |first= John Whitridge |title= Obstetrics: A Text-book for the Use of Students and Practitioners |year=1904 |publisher= D. Appleton and Company |place= New York | isbn= 0-8385-7199-9 |pages=}}
| |
| {{Death}}
| |
| {{pathology}}
| |
| {{Pathology of pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium}}
| |
| {{Use dmy dates|date=June 2011}}
| |
|
| |
| [[Category:Childbirth]]
| |
| [[Category:Medical aspects of death]]
| |
| [[Category:Signs of death]]
| |
| [[Category:Forensic phenomena]]
| |
| [[Category:Obstetrics]] | | [[Category:Obstetrics]] |
| [[Category:Pregnancy with abortive outcome]] | | [[Category:Forensic pathology]] |
| {{stb}}
| | [[Category:Death]] |
| {{No image}}
| |
Postmortem fetal extrusion
Template:Medical condition (new)
Coffin birth, also known as postmortem fetal extrusion, is a rare phenomenon that occurs when a deceased pregnant woman expels a fetus from the uterus after death. This event is typically associated with the buildup of gases within the decomposing body, which increases intra-abdominal pressure and forces the fetus out through the vaginal canal.
Pathophysiology
Coffin birth occurs due to the natural process of decomposition. After death, the body undergoes putrefaction, during which bacteria break down tissues, producing gases such as methane, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide. These gases accumulate within the abdominal cavity, increasing pressure. In a pregnant woman, this pressure can be sufficient to expel the fetus from the uterus through the vagina.
The phenomenon is more likely to occur in the second or third trimester of pregnancy, when the fetus is larger and the uterus is more distended. The process of fetal extrusion can take several days to weeks after the death of the mother, depending on environmental conditions such as temperature and humidity, which affect the rate of decomposition.
Historical Context
Coffin birth has been documented in historical records and archaeological findings. In the past, it was often misunderstood and surrounded by superstition. The term "coffin birth" originates from the observation of this phenomenon in bodies that were exhumed after burial. In some cases, the expulsion of the fetus was mistaken for a live birth occurring postmortem, leading to various myths and legends.
Modern Understanding
Today, coffin birth is understood as a natural consequence of decomposition in a pregnant body. It is a rare occurrence due to modern practices of embalming and refrigeration, which slow down the decomposition process. In forensic pathology, the occurrence of coffin birth can provide information about the time of death and the conditions in which the body was kept.
Forensic Implications
In forensic investigations, the occurrence of coffin birth can complicate the determination of the cause and time of death. It is important for forensic pathologists to recognize the signs of postmortem fetal extrusion to avoid misinterpretation of the findings. The presence of a fetus outside the body of a deceased pregnant woman should be carefully documented and analyzed in the context of the overall decomposition process.
Related Pages
