Normality test: Difference between revisions
CSV import |
CSV import |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
{{statistics-stub}} | {{statistics-stub}} | ||
{{No image}} | {{No image}} | ||
__NOINDEX__ | |||
Latest revision as of 20:12, 17 March 2025
Normality tests are a group of statistical tests used to determine whether a data set is well-modeled by a normal distribution and to compute how likely it is for a random variable underlying the data set to be normally distributed. Such tests are important in statistics because many statistical tests rely on the normality assumption. If the data do not follow a normal distribution, the results of these tests can be misleading or entirely incorrect.
Overview[edit]
Normality tests are used in both descriptive and inferential statistics. In descriptive statistics, they provide a way to summarize the shape of a data set and determine how closely it fits the normal distribution. In inferential statistics, normality tests are often a prerequisite for parametric statistical tests that assume normality, such as the t-test for comparing the means of two groups, ANOVA for comparing means across multiple groups, and regression analysis.
Common Normality Tests[edit]
Several tests are commonly used to assess the normality of data. These include the Shapiro-Wilk test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Lilliefors test, and Anderson-Darling test. Each test has its own advantages and is suitable for different types of data sets.
Shapiro-Wilk Test[edit]
The Shapiro-Wilk test is widely regarded as one of the most powerful normality tests, especially for small sample sizes. It tests the null hypothesis that a sample comes from a normally distributed population.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test[edit]
The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test is a non-parametric test that compares the empirical distribution function of the sample with the expected distribution function of the normal distribution. It is more suitable for larger sample sizes.
Lilliefors Test[edit]
The Lilliefors test is a modification of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test designed to be more sensitive when the parameters of the normal distribution (mean and variance) are estimated from the data.
Anderson-Darling Test[edit]
The Anderson-Darling test gives more weight to the tails of the distribution than the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. It is particularly useful for detecting departures from normality in the tails.
Interpretation of Results[edit]
The interpretation of normality test results involves assessing the p-value from the test. A small p-value (typically ≤ 0.05) indicates that the null hypothesis of normality can be rejected, suggesting that the data do not follow a normal distribution. Conversely, a large p-value suggests that there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and the data may be normally distributed.
Limitations[edit]
Normality tests have their limitations. They are sensitive to sample size, with large samples often leading to rejection of the null hypothesis even for slight deviations from normality. Conversely, small samples may not have enough power to detect significant departures from normality. Additionally, the decision to use parametric or non-parametric tests should not be based solely on the results of normality tests but should also consider the study design and the nature of the data.
Conclusion[edit]
Normality tests are a crucial tool in statistics for assessing the assumption of normality, which underpins many statistical methods. However, their use should be informed by an understanding of their limitations and the context of the data being analyzed.

This article is a statistics-related stub. You can help WikiMD by expanding it!