Post-structuralism: Difference between revisions
CSV import Tags: mobile edit mobile web edit |
CSV import |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
{{philosophy-stub}} | {{philosophy-stub}} | ||
{{No image}} | |||
Revision as of 22:15, 10 February 2025
Post-structuralism is a theoretical framework that emerged in the mid-20th century, primarily in France, among intellectuals who were dissatisfied with structuralism. It is often associated with the works of philosophers such as Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, and Julia Kristeva.
Overview
Post-structuralism is a response to structuralism, a philosophical approach that seeks to understand the underlying structures that govern human behavior and perception. Post-structuralists argue that these structures are not fixed or universal, but are instead subject to change and influenced by power relations.
Key Concepts
Deconstruction
Deconstruction is a key concept in post-structuralism. It is a method of critical analysis that involves examining the underlying assumptions and contradictions in a text. Jacques Derrida, who developed the concept, argued that meaning is not fixed but is constantly being constructed and deconstructed.
Power/Knowledge
Michel Foucault's concept of power/knowledge is another important aspect of post-structuralism. Foucault argued that power and knowledge are intertwined, and that those in power control what is considered knowledge.
Intertextuality
Intertextuality, a concept developed by Julia Kristeva, refers to the ways in which texts influence and are influenced by other texts. This concept challenges the idea of the author as the sole creator of meaning.
Criticisms
Post-structuralism has been criticized for its relativism and its rejection of objective truth. Critics argue that it can lead to a lack of moral and ethical standards, and that it can be used to justify oppressive power structures.
See Also
References
<references />

This article is a philosophy-related stub. You can help WikiMD by expanding it!