Review article: Difference between revisions
CSV import |
CSV import |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
{{Academic-publishing-stub}} | {{Academic-publishing-stub}} | ||
{{Scientific-literature-stub}} | {{Scientific-literature-stub}} | ||
== Review article == | |||
<gallery> | |||
File:Example of Alzheimer's Disease review article.jpg|Example of Alzheimer's Disease review article | |||
File:Main differences between review article and research article.png|Main differences between review article and research article | |||
</gallery> | |||
Latest revision as of 01:04, 20 February 2025
Review article
A Review article is a type of academic article that provides a synthesis of existing research on a particular topic. These articles are often written by experts in the field and are designed to provide an overview of the current understanding on a topic, identify gaps in the current research, and suggest directions for future research.
Overview[edit]
Review articles are often published in academic journals and are a common form of scientific literature. They differ from research papers in that they do not present new primary scholarship, but rather collate and summarize existing research on a topic. This can be useful for researchers who are new to a topic, or for professionals who want to keep up-to-date with the current state of knowledge in their field.
Types of review articles[edit]
There are several types of review articles, including literature reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.
- Literature reviews provide a summary of the important findings in a particular field of study. They are often used to introduce a topic and provide context for a new study.
- Systematic reviews use a more rigorous and well-defined approach to reviewing the literature in a specific subject area. They often include a meta-analysis, which uses statistical techniques to combine the results of different studies.
- Meta-analyses are a type of systematic review that uses statistical methods to combine and analyze the results of multiple studies. This can provide a more accurate estimate of the effect size and can help to resolve uncertainty when studies disagree.
Writing a review article[edit]
Writing a review article requires a deep understanding of the topic and a thorough literature search. The author must be able to critically evaluate the quality of the existing research and to synthesize the findings in a coherent and meaningful way. The process of writing a review article can be broken down into several steps:
- Define the scope of the review: The author must decide what aspects of the topic will be covered in the review.
- Conduct a literature search: The author must identify and retrieve relevant articles on the topic.
- Evaluate the quality of the research: The author must assess the methodological quality of the studies.
- Synthesize the findings: The author must integrate the findings from the different studies into a coherent narrative.
- Write the review: The author must write the review in a clear and concise manner, highlighting the main findings and identifying gaps in the research.
See also[edit]
- Academic publishing
- Scientific literature
- Research paper
- Literature review
- Systematic review
- Meta-analysis
This academic publishing related article is a stub. You can help WikiMD by expanding it.
|
|
|
| Scientific literature | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This scientific literature-related article is a stub. You can help WikiMD by expanding it.
|
Review article[edit]
-
Example of Alzheimer's Disease review article
-
Main differences between review article and research article


