Bibliometrics: Difference between revisions
CSV import |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Bibliometrics''' is a field of study that applies quantitative analysis and statistics to [[publication]]s such as [[book]]s, [[article]]s, and other [[media]] forms. It is a crucial area within [[library and information science]], and it is used to provide a mathematical analysis of written publications. The term "bibliometrics" was first coined by Alan Pritchard in 1969, who defined it as "the application of mathematics and statistical methods to books and other media of communication." | '''Bibliometrics''' is a field of study that applies quantitative analysis and statistics to [[publication]]s such as [[book]]s, [[article]]s, and other [[media]] forms. It is a crucial area within [[library and information science]], and it is used to provide a mathematical analysis of written publications. The term "bibliometrics" was first coined by Alan Pritchard in 1969, who defined it as "the application of mathematics and statistical methods to books and other media of communication." | ||
[[File:A synthesized document co-citation network.png|A synthesized document co-citation network|thumb]] | |||
[[File:Bibliometrics definition.svg|Bibliometrics definition|thumb|left]] | |||
[[File:Statistical evolution of scientific literature on anatomy.jpg|Statistical evolution of scientific literature on anatomy|thumb]] | |||
[[File:When science goes viral - The research response during three months of the COVID-19 outbreak - Fig. 4.jpg|When science goes viral - The research response during three months of the COVID-19 outbreak - Fig. 4|thumb]] | |||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
| Line 22: | Line 26: | ||
==Challenges and Criticisms== | ==Challenges and Criticisms== | ||
Despite its widespread use, bibliometrics is not without its challenges and criticisms. One major concern is the over-reliance on quantitative measures, such as the impact factor, which may not fully capture the quality and significance of scholarly work. There are also concerns about the potential for gaming and manipulation of bibliometric indicators. Furthermore, bibliometrics may not adequately account for differences across disciplines in publication and citation practices. | Despite its widespread use, bibliometrics is not without its challenges and criticisms. One major concern is the over-reliance on quantitative measures, such as the impact factor, which may not fully capture the quality and significance of scholarly work. There are also concerns about the potential for gaming and manipulation of bibliometric indicators. Furthermore, bibliometrics may not adequately account for differences across disciplines in publication and citation practices. | ||
[[Category:Bibliometrics]] | [[Category:Bibliometrics]] | ||
[[Category:Library and information science]] | [[Category:Library and information science]] | ||
[[Category:Scientometrics]] | [[Category:Scientometrics]] | ||
{{medicine-stub}} | {{medicine-stub}} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:55, 1 April 2025
Bibliometrics is a field of study that applies quantitative analysis and statistics to publications such as books, articles, and other media forms. It is a crucial area within library and information science, and it is used to provide a mathematical analysis of written publications. The term "bibliometrics" was first coined by Alan Pritchard in 1969, who defined it as "the application of mathematics and statistical methods to books and other media of communication."




Overview[edit]
Bibliometrics involves the use of quantitative analysis and statistics to explore and understand the patterns, structures, and dynamics of scholarly communication. This can include analyzing the impact of research, mapping scientific fields, and evaluating the productivity and influence of researchers and institutions. The methods used in bibliometrics include citation analysis, content analysis, and network analysis, among others.
History[edit]
The origins of bibliometrics can be traced back to the early 20th century, with the work of scholars like Alfred J. Lotka, who proposed the Lotka's law of scientific productivity, and S.C. Bradford, who developed Bradford's law of scattering. However, it was not until the latter half of the 20th century that bibliometrics began to be recognized as a distinct field, with the development of citation indexes by Eugene Garfield.
Key Concepts[edit]
Citation Analysis[edit]
Citation analysis is one of the most widely used methods in bibliometrics. It involves examining the citations within and among documents to understand the impact and influence of scholarly work. Impact factor, a measure of the frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year, is a well-known metric derived from citation analysis.
Content Analysis[edit]
Content analysis in bibliometrics involves analyzing the content of publications to identify trends, patterns, and themes within a specific field or discipline. This can include keyword analysis, co-word analysis, and topic modeling.
Network Analysis[edit]
Network analysis in bibliometrics is used to examine the relationships and structures within scientific communities. This can involve analyzing co-authorship networks, citation networks, and collaboration networks to understand the dynamics of scholarly communication.
Applications[edit]
Bibliometrics has a wide range of applications in research evaluation, science policy, and library and information science. It is used to assess the impact of individual researchers, institutions, and countries in the global research landscape. Bibliometrics is also employed in the development of research strategies, identification of emerging trends, and allocation of research funding.
Challenges and Criticisms[edit]
Despite its widespread use, bibliometrics is not without its challenges and criticisms. One major concern is the over-reliance on quantitative measures, such as the impact factor, which may not fully capture the quality and significance of scholarly work. There are also concerns about the potential for gaming and manipulation of bibliometric indicators. Furthermore, bibliometrics may not adequately account for differences across disciplines in publication and citation practices.
