Cure Violence: Difference between revisions
CSV import |
CSV import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Cure Violence == | |||
[[File:Logo-primary.jpg|Cure Violence logo|thumb|right]] | [[File:Logo-primary.jpg|Cure Violence logo|thumb|right]] | ||
'''Cure Violence''' is a public health initiative aimed at reducing violence in communities by treating it as a contagious disease. Founded in 2000 by [[Gary Slutkin]], an epidemiologist and physician, the program applies disease control methods to prevent the spread of violence. The organization is headquartered in [[Chicago]], [[Illinois]], and operates in various cities across the [[United States]] and internationally. | |||
== History == | |||
Cure Violence was established in response to the high levels of violence in urban areas, particularly in Chicago. Dr. Gary Slutkin, who had previously worked on infectious disease control in [[Africa]], noticed parallels between the spread of diseases and the spread of violence. He proposed that violence could be "interrupted" using similar strategies employed in disease control, such as identifying and treating the source, changing community norms, and providing support to those affected. | |||
== Methodology == | |||
==Methodology== | |||
The Cure Violence model is based on three main components: | The Cure Violence model is based on three main components: | ||
=== | === Detect and Interrupt Potentially Violent Conflicts === | ||
Trained "violence interrupters" are deployed to identify and mediate potentially violent situations before they escalate. These individuals often have backgrounds similar to those they serve, allowing them to build trust and effectively intervene. | |||
=== | === Identify and Treat High-Risk Individuals === | ||
The program | The program focuses on individuals at high risk of being involved in violence, providing them with counseling, support, and resources to change their behavior. This includes helping them find employment, education, and other opportunities to improve their lives. | ||
== | === Mobilize the Community to Change Norms === | ||
Cure Violence works to change community norms around violence by engaging local leaders, organizing events, and promoting messages of non-violence. The goal is to create a cultural shift that discourages violence and supports peaceful conflict resolution. | |||
Cure Violence has | == Impact == | ||
Studies have shown that Cure Violence has been effective in reducing violence in the areas where it is implemented. For example, evaluations in Chicago and other cities have reported significant reductions in shootings and killings. The program's success has led to its adoption in various international locations, including [[Latin America]], [[Africa]], and the [[Middle East]]. | |||
==Criticism and Challenges== | == Criticism and Challenges == | ||
While Cure Violence has been praised for its innovative approach, it has also faced criticism and challenges. Some critics argue that the program's reliance on former | While Cure Violence has been praised for its innovative approach, it has also faced criticism and challenges. Some critics argue that the program's reliance on former offenders as violence interrupters can be problematic. Additionally, securing consistent funding and measuring long-term impact remain ongoing challenges. | ||
==Related | == Related Pages == | ||
* [[Violence prevention]] | * [[Violence prevention]] | ||
* [[Public health]] | * [[Public health]] | ||
| Line 36: | Line 31: | ||
[[Category:Violence prevention]] | [[Category:Violence prevention]] | ||
[[Category:Public health]] | [[Category:Public health initiatives]] | ||
[[Category:Organizations | [[Category:Organizations based in Chicago]] | ||
Latest revision as of 03:25, 6 March 2025
Cure Violence[edit]

Cure Violence is a public health initiative aimed at reducing violence in communities by treating it as a contagious disease. Founded in 2000 by Gary Slutkin, an epidemiologist and physician, the program applies disease control methods to prevent the spread of violence. The organization is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, and operates in various cities across the United States and internationally.
History[edit]
Cure Violence was established in response to the high levels of violence in urban areas, particularly in Chicago. Dr. Gary Slutkin, who had previously worked on infectious disease control in Africa, noticed parallels between the spread of diseases and the spread of violence. He proposed that violence could be "interrupted" using similar strategies employed in disease control, such as identifying and treating the source, changing community norms, and providing support to those affected.
Methodology[edit]
The Cure Violence model is based on three main components:
Detect and Interrupt Potentially Violent Conflicts[edit]
Trained "violence interrupters" are deployed to identify and mediate potentially violent situations before they escalate. These individuals often have backgrounds similar to those they serve, allowing them to build trust and effectively intervene.
Identify and Treat High-Risk Individuals[edit]
The program focuses on individuals at high risk of being involved in violence, providing them with counseling, support, and resources to change their behavior. This includes helping them find employment, education, and other opportunities to improve their lives.
Mobilize the Community to Change Norms[edit]
Cure Violence works to change community norms around violence by engaging local leaders, organizing events, and promoting messages of non-violence. The goal is to create a cultural shift that discourages violence and supports peaceful conflict resolution.
Impact[edit]
Studies have shown that Cure Violence has been effective in reducing violence in the areas where it is implemented. For example, evaluations in Chicago and other cities have reported significant reductions in shootings and killings. The program's success has led to its adoption in various international locations, including Latin America, Africa, and the Middle East.
Criticism and Challenges[edit]
While Cure Violence has been praised for its innovative approach, it has also faced criticism and challenges. Some critics argue that the program's reliance on former offenders as violence interrupters can be problematic. Additionally, securing consistent funding and measuring long-term impact remain ongoing challenges.