Lancet MMR autism fraud

Lancet MMR Autism Fraud refers to a significant controversy that arose in the medical community following the publication of a research paper in 1998 by Andrew Wakefield, a British former gastroenterologist. The paper, published in the prestigious medical journal The Lancet, suggested a link between the Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) vaccine and the development of autism and bowel disease in children.

Background

Andrew Wakefield and his colleagues at the Royal Free Hospital in London published a case series study in The Lancet in February 1998. The study involved 12 children who had developed behavioral problems and bowel symptoms, and the paper suggested a new syndrome called autistic enterocolitis that linked the MMR vaccine to autism.

Controversy

The publication of the paper sparked a major health scare and led to a significant drop in vaccination rates in the UK and other parts of the world. However, numerous subsequent studies failed to reproduce Wakefield's findings, and a 2004 investigation by Sunday Times journalist Brian Deer revealed undisclosed financial conflicts of interest on Wakefield's part.

Retraction and aftermath

In 2010, following a lengthy investigation, the General Medical Council (GMC) found Wakefield guilty of serious professional misconduct. The Lancet fully retracted the paper, and Wakefield was struck off the UK medical register. Despite this, the controversy continues to have a lasting impact, contributing to ongoing debates about vaccine safety and the rise of vaccine hesitancy.

See also

• Vaccine controversy
• MMR vaccine
• Autism
• Brian Deer
• General Medical Council

   This article is a medical stub. You can help WikiMD by expanding it!

   This article is a psychology-related stub. You can help WikiMD by expanding it!