Prospective cohort study: Difference between revisions
CSV import |
CSV import |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
== Prospective cohort study == | |||
<gallery> | |||
File:ExplainingCaseControlSJW-en.svg | |||
</gallery> | |||
Latest revision as of 21:57, 16 February 2025
Prospective cohort study is a type of observational study in epidemiology where the researcher has control over the exposure factor. The study involves identifying individuals who are at risk of developing a specific disease or health outcome and are then followed over time to see who develops the condition.
Overview[edit]
In a prospective cohort study, the researcher first identifies the at-risk individuals to be included in the study. These individuals are then followed over time to see who develops the disease or health outcome of interest. The researcher records various risk factors and other variables that may influence the development of the disease. The data collected is then analyzed to determine the relationship between the risk factors and the development of the disease.
Methodology[edit]
The methodology of a prospective cohort study involves several steps. First, the researcher identifies the population of interest. This population should be at risk of developing the disease or health outcome of interest. The researcher then collects baseline data on the population, including information on various risk factors. The population is then followed over time, and the occurrence of the disease or health outcome is recorded. The data is then analyzed to determine the relationship between the risk factors and the disease or health outcome.
Advantages and Disadvantages[edit]
Prospective cohort studies have several advantages. They allow for the study of multiple outcomes for a single exposure and can provide more reliable evidence than case-control studies. They also allow for the study of rare diseases, as the population is followed over time.
However, prospective cohort studies also have several disadvantages. They can be expensive and time-consuming, and they require a large number of participants to be statistically significant. They also may not be suitable for studying rare diseases, as the number of cases may be too small to draw meaningful conclusions.
