Truth commission: Difference between revisions
CSV import |
CSV import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Truth Commission == | |||
A ''' | A '''truth commission''' is an official body established to investigate and report on past human rights violations within a specific country or region. These commissions are often formed during periods of political transition, such as the end of a dictatorship or armed conflict, with the aim of uncovering the truth about past abuses, promoting reconciliation, and preventing future violations. | ||
== | === Purpose and Function === | ||
Truth commissions are typically tasked with investigating a broad range of human rights abuses, including [[torture]], [[forced disappearance]], [[extrajudicial killing]], and other forms of [[political repression]]. They aim to provide a comprehensive account of the events that occurred, identify the perpetrators, and recommend measures to prevent recurrence. Unlike judicial bodies, truth commissions do not have the power to prosecute offenders, but they can refer cases to the appropriate legal authorities. | |||
Truth commissions | |||
== | === Notable Examples === | ||
One of the most well-known truth commissions is the [[Truth and Reconciliation Commission (South Africa)|Truth and Reconciliation Commission]] in [[South Africa]], which was established in 1995 to address the atrocities committed during the [[apartheid]] era. Other notable examples include the [[Chilean National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation]] and the [[Peruvian Truth and Reconciliation Commission]]. | |||
== | === Impact and Criticism === | ||
Truth commissions have been praised for their role in promoting healing and reconciliation in post-conflict societies. They provide a platform for victims to share their stories and for societies to confront their past. However, they have also faced criticism for their limited ability to deliver justice and for sometimes being used as political tools by governments. | |||
[[ | === Related Concepts === | ||
[[ | |||
[[ | Truth commissions are part of a broader field known as [[transitional justice]], which includes other mechanisms such as [[criminal tribunals]], [[reparations]], and [[institutional reform]]. These mechanisms work together to address the legacies of human rights abuses and to build a foundation for peace and democracy. | ||
== Related Pages == | |||
* [[Transitional justice]] | |||
* [[Human rights]] | |||
* [[Reconciliation (politics)]] | |||
* [[Restorative justice]] | |||
== References == | |||
* Hayner, Priscilla B. ''Unspeakable Truths: Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions''. Routledge, 2010. | |||
* Freeman, Mark. ''Truth Commissions and Procedural Fairness''. Cambridge University Press, 2006. | |||
== Gallery == | |||
[[File:Museo_memoria_sala_DDHH.JPG|thumb|Exhibit in a museum dedicated to human rights and memory.]] | |||
{{Authority control}} | {{Authority control}} | ||
[[Category:Human rights organizations]] | |||
[[Category:Transitional justice]] | |||
Revision as of 15:46, 9 February 2025
Truth Commission
A truth commission is an official body established to investigate and report on past human rights violations within a specific country or region. These commissions are often formed during periods of political transition, such as the end of a dictatorship or armed conflict, with the aim of uncovering the truth about past abuses, promoting reconciliation, and preventing future violations.
Purpose and Function
Truth commissions are typically tasked with investigating a broad range of human rights abuses, including torture, forced disappearance, extrajudicial killing, and other forms of political repression. They aim to provide a comprehensive account of the events that occurred, identify the perpetrators, and recommend measures to prevent recurrence. Unlike judicial bodies, truth commissions do not have the power to prosecute offenders, but they can refer cases to the appropriate legal authorities.
Notable Examples
One of the most well-known truth commissions is the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa, which was established in 1995 to address the atrocities committed during the apartheid era. Other notable examples include the Chilean National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation and the Peruvian Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
Impact and Criticism
Truth commissions have been praised for their role in promoting healing and reconciliation in post-conflict societies. They provide a platform for victims to share their stories and for societies to confront their past. However, they have also faced criticism for their limited ability to deliver justice and for sometimes being used as political tools by governments.
Related Concepts
Truth commissions are part of a broader field known as transitional justice, which includes other mechanisms such as criminal tribunals, reparations, and institutional reform. These mechanisms work together to address the legacies of human rights abuses and to build a foundation for peace and democracy.
Related Pages
References
- Hayner, Priscilla B. Unspeakable Truths: Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions. Routledge, 2010.
- Freeman, Mark. Truth Commissions and Procedural Fairness. Cambridge University Press, 2006.