Hooding: Difference between revisions
CSV import |
CSV import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Hooding == | |||
[[File:AbuGhraibAbuse-standing-on-box.jpg|thumb|right|A detainee at Abu Ghraib prison subjected to hooding and stress positions.]] | |||
'''Hooding''' is a controversial interrogation technique that involves placing a hood over the head of a person, often a detainee or prisoner. This practice has been used in various contexts, including military and law enforcement settings, and has been the subject of significant ethical and legal debate. | |||
== | == Description == | ||
Hooding typically involves covering the head of an individual with a cloth bag or hood. The purpose of this technique is often to disorient the person, deprive them of sensory input, and create a sense of isolation. Hooding can be used in conjunction with other [[interrogation techniques]], such as [[stress positions]] or [[sleep deprivation]]. | |||
== | == Historical Use == | ||
Hooding has been documented in various historical contexts. It has been used by military forces during conflicts, as well as by law enforcement agencies during interrogations. The technique gained international attention during the [[Iraq War]], particularly in relation to the [[Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse]] scandal. | |||
== | == Ethical and Legal Considerations == | ||
The use of hooding raises significant ethical and legal concerns. Critics argue that it constitutes a form of [[torture]] or [[cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment]]. International human rights organizations, such as [[Amnesty International]] and [[Human Rights Watch]], have condemned the practice and called for its prohibition. | |||
In some jurisdictions, hooding is considered a violation of [[international law]], including the [[United Nations Convention Against Torture]]. The [[European Court of Human Rights]] has also ruled against the use of hooding in certain cases, citing violations of the [[European Convention on Human Rights]]. | |||
== Psychological and Physical Effects == | |||
[[ | Hooding can have significant psychological and physical effects on individuals. The deprivation of sensory input can lead to increased anxiety, fear, and disorientation. Prolonged hooding may result in [[psychological trauma]] and [[post-traumatic stress disorder]] (PTSD). | ||
[[ | |||
Physically, hooding can cause discomfort and difficulty breathing, especially if the hood is tight or if the individual is subjected to stress positions. There is also a risk of [[asphyxiation]] if the hood obstructs the airway. | |||
== Related Pages == | |||
* [[Torture]] | |||
* [[Interrogation]] | |||
* [[Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse]] | |||
* [[Human rights]] | |||
* [[United Nations Convention Against Torture]] | |||
[[Category:Interrogation techniques]] | |||
[[Category:Torture]] | |||
[[Category:Human rights abuses]] | |||
Latest revision as of 05:23, 16 February 2025
Hooding[edit]
Hooding is a controversial interrogation technique that involves placing a hood over the head of a person, often a detainee or prisoner. This practice has been used in various contexts, including military and law enforcement settings, and has been the subject of significant ethical and legal debate.
Description[edit]
Hooding typically involves covering the head of an individual with a cloth bag or hood. The purpose of this technique is often to disorient the person, deprive them of sensory input, and create a sense of isolation. Hooding can be used in conjunction with other interrogation techniques, such as stress positions or sleep deprivation.
Historical Use[edit]
Hooding has been documented in various historical contexts. It has been used by military forces during conflicts, as well as by law enforcement agencies during interrogations. The technique gained international attention during the Iraq War, particularly in relation to the Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse scandal.
Ethical and Legal Considerations[edit]
The use of hooding raises significant ethical and legal concerns. Critics argue that it constitutes a form of torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment. International human rights organizations, such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have condemned the practice and called for its prohibition.
In some jurisdictions, hooding is considered a violation of international law, including the United Nations Convention Against Torture. The European Court of Human Rights has also ruled against the use of hooding in certain cases, citing violations of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Psychological and Physical Effects[edit]
Hooding can have significant psychological and physical effects on individuals. The deprivation of sensory input can lead to increased anxiety, fear, and disorientation. Prolonged hooding may result in psychological trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Physically, hooding can cause discomfort and difficulty breathing, especially if the hood is tight or if the individual is subjected to stress positions. There is also a risk of asphyxiation if the hood obstructs the airway.