Chronic Lyme disease: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
CSV import |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
[[Category:Infectious diseases]] | [[Category:Infectious diseases]] | ||
[[Category:Lyme disease]] | [[Category:Lyme disease]] | ||
{{No image}} | |||
Revision as of 10:03, 10 February 2025
Chronic Lyme disease (CLD) is a controversial term and concept, often used by individuals to describe a broad spectrum of illnesses or symptoms they believe to be caused by an ongoing infection with the bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi. It's important to note that the existence of CLD is not universally recognized within the medical community, and the diagnostic criteria, symptoms, and treatment protocols associated with it are subjects of ongoing debate<ref>,
The clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of Lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America, Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2006, Vol. 43(Issue: 9), pp. 1089–1134, DOI: 10.1086/508667, PMID: 17029130,</ref>.
Understanding Chronic Lyme Disease
The concept of Chronic Lyme disease differs significantly from accepted medical conditions such as Lyme disease, which is a recognized tick-borne disease caused by Borrelia burgdorferi, and Post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome (PTLDS), which refers to persistent symptoms following appropriate treatment for confirmed Lyme disease<ref>,
Lyme Disease: A Review, Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, 2010, Vol. 10(Issue: 1), pp. 13–20, DOI: 10.1007/s11882-009-0082-8, PMID: 20425512,</ref>.
In some instances, Chronic Lyme disease has been used to describe persistent symptoms in individuals without a confirmed Borrelia burgdorferi infection, which has led to concerns about overdiagnosis and overtreatment<ref>,
Chronic Lyme Disease, Infectious Disease Clinics of North America, 2015, Vol. 29(Issue: 2), pp. 325–340, DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2015.02.006, PMID: 25999225,</ref>.
Controversy and Criticism
The diagnosis and treatment of Chronic Lyme disease has been a subject of substantial controversy. Many medical professionals reject the term due to a lack of reproducible or convincing scientific evidence linking this broad range of symptoms to a persistent Borrelia burgdorferi infection. Critics of the Chronic Lyme disease diagnosis argue that it may lead to unnecessary and potentially harmful long-term antibiotic treatment<ref>,
Antiscience and ethical concerns associated with advocacy of Lyme disease, Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2011, Vol. 11(Issue: 9), pp. 713–719, DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70034-2, PMID: 21867956,</ref>.
Conclusion
While the experiences and symptoms of individuals identifying with Chronic Lyme disease are real and can be debilitating, the use of this term and the practices associated with it are contentious. Ongoing research is needed to better understand the causes of persistent symptoms in some individuals following a tick bite, and to develop safe and effective treatments.
See Also
References
<references />
