Greyhound therapy: Difference between revisions
CSV import |
CSV import |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
{{No image}} | |||
__NOINDEX__ | |||
Latest revision as of 13:44, 17 March 2025
Greyhound therapy is a colloquial term referring to the practice of discharging patients from mental health facilities and providing them with a one-way bus ticket to another city. This practice has been criticized for its ethical implications and potential harm to the individuals involved.
History[edit]
The term "Greyhound therapy" originated in the United States in the 1980s, when it was discovered that some states were discharging patients from mental health facilities and providing them with a one-way bus ticket to another city, often without any plans for follow-up care or support. This practice was seen as a way to reduce the number of homeless people in a city or state, but it has been widely criticized for its ethical implications and potential harm to the individuals involved.
Criticism[edit]
Critics of Greyhound therapy argue that it is a form of patient dumping, a practice in which hospitals discharge patients who are unable to pay for their care. They argue that it is unethical to discharge patients without ensuring they have access to appropriate care and support in their new location. In addition, they point out that it can be harmful to the individuals involved, who may end up homeless or in a city where they have no support network.
Legal implications[edit]
In the United States, patient dumping is illegal under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA). However, enforcement of this law can be difficult, particularly in cases where patients are discharged from mental health facilities rather than hospitals. Some states have passed laws specifically prohibiting Greyhound therapy, but enforcement remains a challenge.
See also[edit]
References[edit]
<references />


